Skip to main content

Attempt to suicide no more an offence in India

Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code, says that, whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such offence, shall he punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year. However, upon considering the recommendations of the Law Commission, Government of India introduced Mental Healthcare Bill and the same was passed in the Rajya Sabha on August 8, 2016.

Bill seeks to provide a better health care facilities for those people who are suffering from mental illnesses. Bill also seeks to decriminalize the offence of Attempt to Suicide. By virtue of Section 124 of the Mental Healthcare Bill, notwithstanding anything contained in section 309 of the Indian Penal Code, any person who attempts to commit suicide shall be presumed, unless proved otherwise, to be suffering from mental illness at the time of attempting suicide and shall not be liable to punishment under the said section.

Section 124 further provides that, the appropriate Government shall have a duty to provide care, treatment and rehabilitation to a person, having mental illness and who attempted to commit suicide, to reduce the risk of recurrence of attempt to commit suicide.

In P. Rathinam v. Union of India, (1994 AIR 1844, 1994 SCC (3) 394) Honourable Supreme Court held that, an act of suicide cannot be said to be against religion, morality or public policy, and an act of attempted suicide has no baneful effect on society. Further, suicide or attempt to commit it causes no harm to others, because of which State's interference with the personal liberty of the persons concerned is not called for.

Thus, the Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code violates the Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Hence, it was held that, Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code deserves to be effaced from the statute book to humanize our penal laws.

However, in Smt. Gian Kaur v. The State of Punjab, (1996 AIR 946, 1996 SCC (2) 648) Supreme Court of India held that, Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code is not violative of either Article 14 or Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. In other words, the apex court held that, Section 309 of IPC is constitutionally valid.

Further, in 210th Law Commission Report on Humanization and Decriminalization of Attempt to Suicide, it is felt that attempt to suicide may be regarded more as a manifestation of a diseased condition of mind deserving treatment and care rather than an offence to be visited with punishment.

In Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India & Ors., [(2011) 4 SCC 454] Supreme Court of India opined that, although Section 309 of IPC has been held to be constitutionally valid in Gian Kaur's case, the time has come when it should be deleted by Parliament as it has become anachronistic. A person attempts suicide in a depression, and hence he needs help, rather than punishment. We therefore recommend to Parliament to consider the feasibility of deleting Section 309 from the Indian Penal Code.


Popular posts from this blog

Importance of Bar & Bench relationship

In general, Bar refers to the lawyers and Bench refers to the members of the judiciary, i.e., Judges. It is the body of persons which operates the machinery through which justice is administered, composed mainly of the Judges and the Advocates who help them in discharging their difficult duties, has existed and functioned both in ancient and modern times.
Bar & Bench relations in law refers to the cordial relationship between Advocates (Bar) and Judges (Bench). Bar and Bench plays an important role in the administration of justice. Bench administer the justice with the help of the Bar.
The Judicial Process in today’s world includes that task of Social Engineering. Concepts of justice, however, have changed vastly in the course of time. And, as between different States in modern times too, Justice, as embodied in the law, has different contents and connotations.
Such differences as we find between different States as regards the functions of the Bar and Bench are, mainly due to the so…

Definition of Person under Income Tax Act

Abhilash CU, M.Com, FCA, ACS
The term Person under Income Tax Act has wide meaning and interpretation than the normal meaning of person. The definition of person has a vide implication that “assesse “under the act is defined as a “person” by whom income tax or super tax or any other sum of money is payable under the act. So in order to be declared an assesse under the Income Tax Act, the assesse must be a “Person” as defined under the Income Tax Act of 1961.The term “Person” has been defined under Sec2(31) of the Income Tax Act of 1961. The definition of “Person” is as follows.

"Person" includes— An individual,A Hindu Undivided Family,A Company,A Firm,An Association of Persons or a Body of Individuals, whether incorporated or not,A Local Authority, andEvery artificial juridical person, not falling within any of the preceding sub-clauses;The definition is inclusive and not exhaustive i.e. any other Person can also be included under the definition of Person under Income Tax Act.

Nature, Definition & Scope of Administrative Law

Administrative law is considered a branch of public law. Administrative law is the body of law which governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. Government agency action can include rulemaking, adjudication, or the enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda.
Further, we can say that, the Administrative Law is a branch of law governing the creation and operation of administrative agencies. Of special importance are the powers granted to administrative agencies, the substantive rules that such agencies make, and the legal relationships between such agencies, other government bodies, and the public at large.

Similarly, Administrative law is a body of rules, regulations and orders formulated by a government body such as an environment management agency responsible for carrying out statute law.
In other words, these are the legal rules and principles on which courts act in controlling the exercise of statutory powers of adjudication and rule making by public authorities…