Skip to main content

Freedom of speech and expression in India

Freedom for speech and expression is one of the hot topic of debate today, especially in India. Cause of action behind such debate is that, the various State Governments as well as the Central Government is recently imposing lots of restrictions on the use of social media or arresting people on the ground of misusing social media.

In this circumstances, let’s try to understand the concept of freedom of speech and expression in the Indian context.

Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech and expression subject to the reasonable restrictions imposed under the sub-clause 2 of the Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

As observed by the Privy Council in Channing Arnold v. King Emperor [AIR 1914 PC 116, 117], there was no statutory provisions in the pre-independent India to protect or guarantee the freedom of press. Though the Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees the freedom of speech and expression, it doesn’t specifically mention the freedom of press.

Honourable Supreme Court in Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras [AIR 1950 SC 124], held that, the freedom of speech and of the press lay at the foundation of all democratic organisations, for without free political discussion no public education, so essential for the proper functioning of the process of popular government, is possible.

However, in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [AIR 1978 SC 597], it was held by the Honourable Apex Court that the freedom of speech and expression has no geographical limitation and it carries with it the right of a citizen to gather information and to exchange thought with others not only in India but abroad also.

Freedom of speech and expression and Social Media

As observed by the apex court in Indian Express v. Union of India [(1985) 1 SCC 641], the press plays a very significant role in the democratic machinery. Three essential elements of the freedom of press are; freedom of access to all sources of information, freedom of publication, and freedom of circulation. All these are applicable to social media as well.

Thus, in the present scenario we can consider social media also as a kind of press. Hence, we may interpret the freedom of press along with the concept of freedom of speech and expression in Social Media.

Social media has become a vital tool for communication in the modern world, where most of us are having smartphones in our pocket. Social media plays a very vital role in exchange of information very instantly and to connect with people.

Freedom of speech and expression are considered as a fundamental right in whatever medium it is exercised. The same is recognized under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Further, in the light of the growing importance of the social media like facebook, instagram, whatsapp, twitter, Linkedin etc. as a medium of exercising the freedom of speech and expression, access to social media has also been recognized as a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights(UDHR) as well as Article 19(2) of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights.


Popular posts from this blog

Importance of Bar & Bench relationship

In general, Bar refers to the lawyers and Bench refers to the members of the judiciary, i.e., Judges. It is the body of persons which operates the machinery through which justice is administered, composed mainly of the Judges and the Advocates who help them in discharging their difficult duties, has existed and functioned both in ancient and modern times.
Bar & Bench relations in law refers to the cordial relationship between Advocates (Bar) and Judges (Bench). Bar and Bench plays an important role in the administration of justice. Bench administer the justice with the help of the Bar.
The Judicial Process in today’s world includes that task of Social Engineering. Concepts of justice, however, have changed vastly in the course of time. And, as between different States in modern times too, Justice, as embodied in the law, has different contents and connotations.
Such differences as we find between different States as regards the functions of the Bar and Bench are, mainly due to the so…

Definition of Person under Income Tax Act

Abhilash CU, M.Com, FCA, ACS
The term Person under Income Tax Act has wide meaning and interpretation than the normal meaning of person. The definition of person has a vide implication that “assesse “under the act is defined as a “person” by whom income tax or super tax or any other sum of money is payable under the act. So in order to be declared an assesse under the Income Tax Act, the assesse must be a “Person” as defined under the Income Tax Act of 1961.The term “Person” has been defined under Sec2(31) of the Income Tax Act of 1961. The definition of “Person” is as follows.

"Person" includes— An individual,A Hindu Undivided Family,A Company,A Firm,An Association of Persons or a Body of Individuals, whether incorporated or not,A Local Authority, andEvery artificial juridical person, not falling within any of the preceding sub-clauses;The definition is inclusive and not exhaustive i.e. any other Person can also be included under the definition of Person under Income Tax Act.

Nature, Definition & Scope of Administrative Law

Administrative law is considered a branch of public law. Administrative law is the body of law which governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. Government agency action can include rulemaking, adjudication, or the enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda.
Further, we can say that, the Administrative Law is a branch of law governing the creation and operation of administrative agencies. Of special importance are the powers granted to administrative agencies, the substantive rules that such agencies make, and the legal relationships between such agencies, other government bodies, and the public at large.

Similarly, Administrative law is a body of rules, regulations and orders formulated by a government body such as an environment management agency responsible for carrying out statute law.
In other words, these are the legal rules and principles on which courts act in controlling the exercise of statutory powers of adjudication and rule making by public authorities…