Skip to main content

Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act, 2017 could be an encroachment to the Civil Rights

As reported in The New York Times, the Bill introduced in the House of Representatives on February 9, 2017 could have an effect of ending the Class action as an American Institution. Said bill was titled as the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017.

The bill was introduced to amend the procedures used in Federal court class actions and multi-district litigation proceedings to assure fairer, more efficient outcomes for claimants and defendants, and for other purposes.

The main purpose of the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017 is to (a) assure fair and prompt recoveries for class members and multi-district litigation plaintiffs with legitimate claims; (b) diminish abuses in class action and mass tort litigation that are undermining the integrity of the U.S. legal system; and (c) restore the intent of the framers of the United States Constitution by ensuring Federal court consideration of interstate controversies of national importance consistent with diversity jurisdiction principles.

However, CHRIS SAGERS and JOSHUA P. DAVIS in their article titled “Proposed Law Could Be a New Attack on Civil Rights”, pointed out that, “If Congress kills the class action, many laws protecting ordinary people will become unenforceable. Nobody would pay a lawyer to bring most individual cases under our anti-fraud, product safety, antitrust, civil rights or employment laws, for example. The individual harm is usually small, though the policy is crucial and the overall social injury may be in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

It was further observed by CHRIS SAGERS and JOSHUA P. DAVIS that, the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act throws in a grab bag of other new provisions, most of them with little effect but to complicate or otherwise frustrate litigation. The consequence will be to make cases unattractive to the plaintiffs’ lawyers who shoulder the huge financial risks, and for the nonprofit organizations that bring many civil rights claims, leaving many Americans with no feasible way to enforce their rights at all.

According to them, if the Bill leading to the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017 becomes law, that would end class-action lawsuits would be a disservice to the working class.


Popular posts from this blog

Importance of Bar & Bench relationship

In general, Bar refers to the lawyers and Bench refers to the members of the judiciary, i.e., Judges. It is the body of persons which operates the machinery through which justice is administered, composed mainly of the Judges and the Advocates who help them in discharging their difficult duties, has existed and functioned both in ancient and modern times.
Bar & Bench relations in law refers to the cordial relationship between Advocates (Bar) and Judges (Bench). Bar and Bench plays an important role in the administration of justice. Bench administer the justice with the help of the Bar.
The Judicial Process in today’s world includes that task of Social Engineering. Concepts of justice, however, have changed vastly in the course of time. And, as between different States in modern times too, Justice, as embodied in the law, has different contents and connotations.
Such differences as we find between different States as regards the functions of the Bar and Bench are, mainly due to the so…

Definition of Person under Income Tax Act

Abhilash CU, M.Com, FCA, ACS
The term Person under Income Tax Act has wide meaning and interpretation than the normal meaning of person. The definition of person has a vide implication that “assesse “under the act is defined as a “person” by whom income tax or super tax or any other sum of money is payable under the act. So in order to be declared an assesse under the Income Tax Act, the assesse must be a “Person” as defined under the Income Tax Act of 1961.The term “Person” has been defined under Sec2(31) of the Income Tax Act of 1961. The definition of “Person” is as follows.

"Person" includes— An individual,A Hindu Undivided Family,A Company,A Firm,An Association of Persons or a Body of Individuals, whether incorporated or not,A Local Authority, andEvery artificial juridical person, not falling within any of the preceding sub-clauses;The definition is inclusive and not exhaustive i.e. any other Person can also be included under the definition of Person under Income Tax Act.

Nature, Definition & Scope of Administrative Law

Administrative law is considered a branch of public law. Administrative law is the body of law which governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. Government agency action can include rulemaking, adjudication, or the enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda.
Further, we can say that, the Administrative Law is a branch of law governing the creation and operation of administrative agencies. Of special importance are the powers granted to administrative agencies, the substantive rules that such agencies make, and the legal relationships between such agencies, other government bodies, and the public at large.

Similarly, Administrative law is a body of rules, regulations and orders formulated by a government body such as an environment management agency responsible for carrying out statute law.
In other words, these are the legal rules and principles on which courts act in controlling the exercise of statutory powers of adjudication and rule making by public authorities…